Follow @ra7s
Obama Eager to Implement "Aussie" Gun Laws

Obama Eager to Implement "Aussie" Gun Laws

Obama Lacks the Skill to Evaluate Information for Factual Content, to use Reason to Interpretet Facts to Reach Valid Conclusions

On June 10, President Obama spent 7 minutes talking about gun control. In typical fashion, he neglected to pinpoint the true cause of mass shootings and instead labeled gun owners as the main reason mass shootings occur.

He totally ignored the link between the use of anti-depressants (SSRIs) and mass shootings when he expressed disappointment about his inability to enact tougher gun laws.

And he also failed to mention the U.S. media's role in making it seem like gun violence and mass shootings are on the rise, when according to numerous studies, the opposite is actually true.

Here's what Obama said:

If you watch the video, you'll see Obama was eager to vilify gun owners and 2nd Amendment supporters.

He said the ability for anyone to access ammunition and assault rifles is the real reason gun violence is on the rise and he was "disappointed" that we as a society haven't done more to curb the mass shooting epidemic.

CPRC at Fox News: What liberal media won't tell you: School shooting deaths down, not up, across America

Obama claimed as a parent, the society his children are growing up in should have stricter gun control for their safety. He said, "Levels of gun violence are off the charts... There is no advanced developed country on Earth that would put up with this."

Is 'gun violence epidemic' a monumental gun control fraud?

So what does he propose to solve this problem?

Obama praised the sweeping gun confiscation that took place in Australia in the late 1990s and said:

"Couple of decades ago, Australia had a mass shooting, similar to Columbine or Newtown," Obama said. "And Australia just said, well, that's it, we're not doing, we're not seeing that again, and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws, and they haven't had a mass shooting since."


What would this cost? OZ spent $500,000,000 1996 OZ dollars to seize and melt down 641,000 guns, getting 56% of AU guns
That means that there were 1,187,000 guns before the ban. In the US there are estimated 350,000,000 guns and increasing at the rate of about 20,000,000 per year. 56% of 350,000,000 is 196,000,000.
196M is 306 times the number of guns siezed at a cost of $500M 1996 AUD and without taking into account the difference of AUD in 1996 to USD and how that amount has changed in 18 years the cost to get the same proportion of US guns would be $147,500M.
Thats about $150 Billion. That is a significant chunk of change. That would not be the only cost. It is estimated that 3% of the 100 million gun owners, thats 3 million heavily armed resistors would resist confiscation. You want to take our guns away because of 10K homicides per year? Three million gun owners will produce three million dead police and add another three million dead people to the count when they are killed in the process. Ten thouand per year, make that 6 million ten thousand. Come and take it.
When adjusting for $AU to $US and for inflation thee cost rises to $180,400 million.

And while they haven't seen a mass shooting since, local officials say that gun violence on the continent is much worse than it was before the tougher gun policies went into effect.

Meanwhile, the one thing that the President failed to recognize is that gun crime in the U.S. is on the decline.

According to a PEW research study, gun crime is down 49% since 1993.

Another study by the Bureau of Justice Statistics showed that non-fatal gun crime is actually down 70% since the same time.

Even the President's own study performed by the Center for Disease Control reached a similar conclusion: "Firearm-related death rates for youth ages 15 to 19 declined from 1994 to 2009," the report states. "The number of public mass shootings of the type that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School accounted for a very small fraction of all firearm-related deaths."

What these studies show is there's a clear agenda being carried out by the Mainstream Media to make it seem like mass shootings are the norm.

As soon as a mass shooting happens, it reverberates through all the major news networks for weeks, much like an echo after the initial shot.

Because of this, much of the nation seems to believe that gun violence, particularly school shootings, is on the rise even with evidence that points to the contrary.

The only thing on the rise is the use of mind-altering drugs, which have increased in usage by 400% since the late 1980s.

Nearly every single mass shooting was committed by someone who was on these drugs, and the altered brain chemistry of these individuals is more to blame than their ability to access a semi-automatic rifle.

Obama is clearly looking for any excuse he can to take guns out of the hands of those who legally own them.